grille d'évaluation ISO 22000 version 2018 en format Excel est un outil structuré permettant de mesurer la conformité d'un Système de Management de la Sécurité des Aliments (SMSDA) par rapport aux exigences de la norme internationale
Les formules Excel calculent instantanément votre taux de conformité global et par chapitre.
| Clause | Requirement Question | Audit Evidence | Status | Comments | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | | | | | | 4.1 | Has the organization determined external and internal issues relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of the FSMS? | | | | | 4.2 | Has the organization determined interested parties relevant to the FSMS and their requirements? | | | | | 4.3 | Has the organization determined the scope of the FSMS? Is it available as documented information? | | | | | 4.4 | Has the organization established, implemented, maintained, and continually improved a FSMS in accordance with the requirements of this document? | | | | | 5. Leadership | | | | | | 5.1 | Does top management demonstrate leadership and commitment with respect to the FSMS? | | | | | 5.2 | Has top management established, implemented, and maintained a food safety policy? Is it communicated? | | | | | 5.3 | Have relevant roles, responsibilities, and authorities been assigned and communicated? | | | | | 6. Planning | | | | | | 6.1 | Has the organization planned actions to address risks and opportunities? | | | | | 6.2 | Has the organization established FS objectives at relevant functions, levels, and processes needed for the FSMS? | | | | | 6.3 | Has the organization planned changes to the FSMS and manage them effectively? | | | | | 7. Support | | | | | | 7.1.1 | Does the organization determine and provide the resources needed for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the FSMS? | | | | | 7.1.2 | Are persons competent based on appropriate education, training, or experience? | | | | | 7.1.3 | Has the organization determined, provided, and maintained the infrastructure needed for the FSMS? | | | | | 7.1.4 | Has the organization determined, provided, and maintained the work environment needed for the FSMS? | | | | | 7.1.5 | Has the organization established, implemented, and maintained a traceability system? | | | | | 7.1.6 | Does the organization have documented procedures for the management of externally developed elements of the FSMS? | | | | | 7.2 | Are personnel competent? Is necessary competence determined on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience? | | | | | 7.3 | Are personnel aware of the food safety policy, relevance of their activities, and implications of non-conformity? | | | | | 7.4 | Has the organization determined the internal and external communications relevant to the FSMS? | | | | | 7.5 | Does the FSMS include documented information required by this document and necessary for effectiveness? | | | | | 8. Operation (Operational Planning) | | | | | | 8.1 | Has the organization planned, established, implemented, and maintained the operational processes needed to meet requirements? | | | | | 8.2 | Prerequisite Programs (PRPs): Are PRPs established and documented? Do they support food safety? | | | | | 8.3 | Traceability: Is the traceability system able to identify product lots and their relation to batches of raw materials? | | | | | 8.4 | Emergency Preparedness: Are procedures established to manage potential emergency situations? | | | | | 8.5 | Hazard Control: Has the organization implemented a hazard analysis to determine hazards that need to be controlled? | | | | | 8.5.2 | Are the levels of acceptable/unacceptable hazards defined? | | | | | 8.5.4 | Are Control Measures (CCPs/OPRPs) categorized and managed effectively? | | | | | 8.6 | Are validation activities performed for the combination of control measures? | | | | | 8.7 | Verification: Is verification planned to ensure that the hazard control plan is implemented effectively? | | | | | 8.8 | Control of Nonconformities: Are procedures established to handle actual or potential nonconforming outputs? | | | | | 8.9 | Withdrawal/Recall: Are procedures established for the withdrawal and recall of products? | | | | | 9. Performance Evaluation | | | | | | 9.1 | Does the organization monitor, measure, analyze, and evaluate the performance of the FSMS? | | | | | 9.2 | Is the internal audit conducted at planned intervals? Does it report on the effectiveness of the FSMS? | | | | | 9.3 | Does top management review the FSMS at planned intervals to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness? | | | | | 10. Improvement | | | | | | 10.1 | Has the organization determined and selected opportunities for improvement and implemented any necessary actions? | | | | | 10.2 | Nonconformity and Corrective Action: When a nonconformity occurs, does the organization react and take action to control and correct it? | | | | | 10.3 | Does the organization continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the FSMS? | | | | grille d 39-evaluation iso 22000 version 2018 excel
: Propose un outil d'auto-évaluation gratuit incluant un manuel d'utilisation, une grille de diagnostic chapitre par chapitre et une synthèse des résultats.
La version 2018 de l’ISO 22000 a introduit des changements majeurs par rapport à la version 2005 (cycle PDCA à deux niveaux, gestion du risque opérationnel, contexte de l’organisation). Votre grille doit absolument refléter cette nouvelle philosophie. grille d'évaluation ISO 22000 version 2018 en format
Assign tasks to address non-conformities found during audits. Key Clauses for the Grid
Cet outil, souvent sous-estimé, est le couteau suisse de l’auditeur. Dans cet article, nous allons décortiquer sa structure, son utilité, et comment la concevoir ou l’optimiser pour transformer votre audit interne en véritable levier d’amélioration. | | | | | 4
Grille d'évaluation ISO 22000 Version 2018 Excel : Guide Pratique de Mise en Conformité